Invention Exercise using Roen, et al (pp 267-8, Stancliff)

One of the major assignments from Introduction to Rhetorical Studies is the following.

**************************************

Scrapbook Project:

The purpose of this assignment is to have you do a sustained analysis of a “theme” across time—doing rhetorical thinking about an issue or idea. I’ll want you to use this assignment to try out some of the approaches we’ve developed during the semester. First, you’ll need to select a “theme” to trace throughout the semester. This is the tricky part because you’ll want a topic sure to generate some articles in print or online newspapers, etc., but you don’t want it sooo big that you won’t be able to keep up with coverage.

For example, global warming is a huge topic, but if you watched for news coverage just about America or just about Africa, or just about water issues—that might work. The upcoming elections might be good fodder for watching, but as the debate heated up, you might find narrowing it to the debate and news regarding one candidate might be interesting and more doable. You could pick a local topic like the gas industry debate. Or maybe an event happens, like, heaven forbid, a coal mine disaster in this area that you could follow. Maybe it might be a sports team and some issue around that, or your home town and a trial. Please pick something that catches your interest!

The library has newspapers, even the New York Times. You might find topic in our local school paper, but my experience shows that continued coverage of a theme isn’t really normal for that paper. Online papers are great resources. And you don’t have to just follow one newspaper source though I would strongly suggest that following one source of news is much, much easier and in turn, easier to analyze in the end.

But once you’ve got an idea, something you are really interested in, then start collecting clippings (or printings from the internet) about your theme. You might want a sketchbook or notebook to tape them into. If you print online articles, then a binder might be best. You’ll gather these over the course of the whole semester. Be selective. Quality is better than quantity.

The final paper will examine the theme based on the clippings you have found. They will be the “evidence” you bring to bear for your analysis and thinking. How is the theme discussed in the paper(s)? What perspectives are offered? How do they differ or seem similar? In what kinds of places did the theme appear? Was that significant (front page or back page, etc.). Are there other issues surrounding this theme that crop up? Has the issue’s stasis (the point of contention) changed over the course of the semester? Has people’s feelings about it changed? What kind of visual images accompany the clippings and why? What effect does that have on the reading? Think about delivery here—how do the visuals delivery messages differently than the texts? Does Kairos play a part? These are just ideas…..but use what you have learned to do your analysis and cite your clippings.

Thumbnail details:

  • 4 or so pages rhetorical analysis of a “theme”
  • MLA style header and a very brief Works Cited with newspaper(s) listed in proper format
  • When you cite a clipping, put the issue and date and page in parentheses (I’ll show you how)
  • Due toward the end of the semester (see syllabus)
  • When done—give me a writer’s memo on top, then a final copy, a draft (we’ll workshop these in class) with marks on it for revision and editing, and your clippings book.

Do not put this off. Work a little on it once during the week and once on the weekend. If you do this, the paper will come easily! But if you put it off and don’t work on it, oh my! Ack! Argh! Pain and suffering! Gloom and despair!

*********************************************************8

Reading the essay by Stancliff has made me rethink this assignment. I realize that I have sort of let the students flounder in helping them pick out a topic. Stancliff suggests writing the topics down on a piece of paper and then having each student one on one adds comments. I’m wondering if another version of this might be to have students bring in three topics/clippings/etc. On a sheet of paper, they might summarize the three different topics in a sentence. Then working in groups of three, they share these ideas with their groupmates, offering feedbackon the topics—which one seems most interesting? What kinds of evidence will you find? Does this topic or one of the other have a better chance of taking wings? Then we’d go ‘round the room, sharing which topic seemed to be the most fertile, offering comments and feedback.

So, here’s the reworked version of this assignment:

Scrapbook Project:

The purpose of this assignment is to have you do a sustained analysis of a “theme” across time—doing rhetorical thinking about an issue or idea. I’ll want you to use this assignment to try out some of the approaches we’ve developed during the semester.

Step One:

You’ll need to select a “theme” to trace throughout the semester. This is the tricky part because you’ll want a topic sure to generate some articles in print or online newspapers, etc., but you don’t want it sooo big that you won’t be able to keep up with coverage.

For example, global warming is a huge topic, but if you watched for news coverage just about America or just about Africa, or just about water issues—that might work. The upcoming elections might be good fodder for watching, but as the debate heated up, you might find narrowing it to the debate and news regarding one candidate might be interesting and more doable. You could pick a local topic like the gas industry debate. Or maybe an event happens, like, heaven forbid, a coal mine disaster in this area that you could follow. Maybe it might be a sports team and some issue around that, or your home town and a trial. Please pick something that catches your interest!

On [Date] bring in three topics/clippings/etc. Pick these for a real sense of interest in finding out about them. Upload these to your website and write a summary paragraph at the beginning that shows why you are interested in each topic. Then working in groups of three, share these ideas with their group mates, offering feedback on the topics—which one seems most interesting? What kinds of evidence will you find? Does this topic or one of the other have a better chance of taking wings? Then we’d go ‘round the room, sharing topics which seemed to be the most fertile, offering comments and feedback. You should leave the class with a clear idea of which “theme” you will be following, and a beginning for your scrapbook!

 Step Two:

Begin collecting artifacts! You might find topic in our local school paper, but my experience shows that continued coverage of a theme isn’t really normal for that paper. An Atlanta paper would give you something close to home, and a paper such as The New York Times could give you perspective on a national issue. Online papers are great resources. And you don’t have to just follow one newspaper source though I would strongly suggest that following one source of news is much, much easier and in turn, easier to analyze in the end.

But once you’ve got an idea, something you are really interested in, then start collecting clippings (or printings from the internet), or upload them to a place on your websibe about your theme. You might want a sketchbook or notebook to tape them into. If you print online articles, then a binder might be best. You’ll gather these over the course of the whole semester. Be selective. Quality is better than quantity. Need to Adapt to Digital

Step Three:

The final paper will examine the theme based on the clippings you have found. They will be the “evidence” you bring to bear for your analysis and thinking. How is the theme discussed in the paper(s)? What perspectives are offered? How do they differ or seem similar? In what kinds of places did the theme appear? Was that significant (front page or back page, etc.). Are there other issues surrounding this theme that crop up? Has the issue’s stasis (the point of contention) changed over the course of the semester? Has people’s feelings about it changed? What kind of visual images accompany the clippings and why? What effect does that have on the reading? Think about delivery here—how do the visuals delivery messages differently than the texts? Does Kairos play a part? These are just ideas…..but use what you have learned to do your analysis and cite your clippings.

Thumbnail details:

  • 4 or so pages rhetorical analysis of a “theme”
  • MLA style header and a very brief Works Cited with newspaper(s) listed in proper format
  • When you cite a clipping, put the issue and date and page in parentheses (I’ll show you how)
  • Due toward the end of the semester (see syllabus)
  • When done—give me a writer’s memo on top, then a final copy, a draft (we’ll workshop these in class) with marks on it for revision and editing, and your clippings book.

Do not put this off. Work a little on it once during the week and once on the weekend. If you do this, the paper will come easily! But if you put it off and don’t work on it, oh my!

*********************************************************

I still need to add rubrics and outcomes here and a peer review step.

 

 

 

Richard Weaver

Richard Weaver said that “every utterance is a major assumption of responsibility.” I’m aware of that as I begin this website.

2 thoughts on “Invention Exercise using Roen, et al (pp 267-8, Stancliff)

  1. This assignment sounds like a good way to help students understand how issues develop over time and through multiple perspectives.

    Is there a way you can help students see how the work they do with this assignment might transfer to other courses? What “handles” can you provide for students so they think about transfer?

    I suspect that some/many students will want to maintain online folders rather than print documents. How might you adjust the assignment to accommodate these students while keeping the scrapbook “feel” you’re after. Could you have the students somehow map the clippings? Might they develop an online timeline using free tools?

    1. Well, I have written a lengthy response twice to this, and in my haste to paste in links, managed to delete it by hitting back on this page by mistake. blah. If I were writing with a pen, this wouldn’t have happened. Now maybe the building might have burned down, but that would have taken some time, eh? I’ll try to birth a third twin. The labor is heavy.

      So, of all the assignments in this course, there is a play analysis that is course-centric, and there is this that is to all appearances course-centric. Everything else, even the daily “rhetor’s logs” are happening outside the course. There needs to be something semester long (such as this) that pulls what they are doing in their rhetorical speaking project, the rhetorical writing project, and other such things, back home to stew and simmer. This does that, especially since it is woven into the very fabric of discussion and mini-activities throughout the semester. However, on closer inspection, it is obvious that it is all of the assignments the most inter-disciplinary, and in the end is the things that forms the bedrock of all the learning spinning in other contexts. This all comes to fruition in the substantial final reflective project which is highly directed.

      Regarding the online matter–this is something I’ve thought about but am not sure what to do. There is something lost in not having the tactile commonplace book in progress, and the online examples of commonplace books I’ve found are so pretty and neat and slick. If you ever see a real commonplace book in an archive–they resist prettiness and slickness as a representation of the mind that created it. I’m hoping that Emory has a collection of commonplace books for the students to handle and see. So I’m still thinking about it.

      No links this time to examples of commonplace books–I’m not losing this response! But I’ll post one:
      http://willscommonplacebook.blogspot.com/
      So, what would enhance this book is the student making a real fabric something to place in the book.

      If a student was following Hilary’s campaign trail for example, is a picture of a bumpersticker as interesting as an actual one? A photograph of a button? Of course a video of a speech is better than no speech. So it is complicated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *